Choices to Address Foreign Currency Exposure

March 22, 2016 - Momtchil Pojarliev, Deputy Head of Currencies

OVERVIEW Institutional investor portfolios typically hold a signifi cant allocation of foreign currency denominated assets. Left unmanaged, this currency exposure functions like a buy-and-hold strategy which receives little or no risk premium and adds unwanted volatility to portfolio returns. In this paper, we discuss the variety of solutions to address foreign currency exposures such as using passive currency management choices or selecting from the different active currency management solutions available.


Foreign currency exposure is a by-product of international investing. When obtaining exposure to global assets, investors also obtain the embedded foreign currency exposure. The sharp increase in the value of the US dollar since mid-2014 has caused a big divergence in the performance of US equities and unhedged international equities due in part to the depreciation of foreign currencies against the US dollar. Foreign currency return is measured as the difference in the return to an unhedged portfolio versus that portfolio position hedged back into the investor’s domestic currency. Exhibit 1 plots the foreign currency return of the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index since the introduction of the euro in January 1999 until December 2015. The chart illustrates that unmanaged foreign currency exposure is a source of uncompensated risk. Currency has no long-term expected return, because although it is a risk exposure, it is not an economic asset for which a long-term premium exists. From January 1999 until December 2015, the average foreign currency return has been about zero (-0.12%), but the volatility has been 6.63% and the drawdown has been as high as 28.45%. In a weak US dollar environment, from 2000 until 2011, US investors enjoyed a windfall as the foreign currency return contributed positively to the performance of international equities. The positive return from holding foreign currencies might have contributed to the unwillingness to address this uncompensated risk. However, since mid-2014, the foreign currency return has fallen about 20%, causing a significant drag on performance.


Although there is no best-practice solution to address foreign currency exposures, institutional investors have the following choices (see Exhibit 2).

  1. Do nothing, i.e. maintain unhedged foreign currency exposure in international equities
  2. Hedge at least some (perhaps up to 100%) of the foreign currency exposure
  3. Use dynamic hedging (D-H) techniques to vary the hedge ratio
  4. Use active currency management to vary the hedge ratio
  5. Try to overcome the return shortfall through allocation to currency alpha

Options 1 and 2 are passive currency management choices. Options 2, 3 and 4 represent the different active currency management solutions available. The best solution will differ from institution to institution. But it boils down to two fundamental choices. First, the importance of risk versus return and negative cash flow. Second, investors must decide if they believe that currency managers are able to achieve a positive information ratio after fees over the long run and importantly, if they will be able to identify these currency managers. In the following sections, we will address the available choices in more detail.


Mehr zu diesem Thema
January 11, 2019

Central banks induce regime shifts

October 10, 2018

So far so good, but markets underestimate risks

September 10, 2018

SUMMARY: US equities continued to outperform other markets such as EMU and EM equities. This partly reflects the divergence between the US economy -which is supported by fiscal expansion and a patient Federal Reserve- and relatively weaker growth in the eurozone and EM. But there is more to this divergence than faster US economic growth. The US equity rally has been led by the IT sector. This has accounted for 20%-50% of US equity returns since 2016. The rally is now looking stretched on various metrics. The other salient development in August was renewed stress in emerging markets (EM). A combination of economic stress in Turkey, weaker growth in China, Sino-US trade tensions and a stronger US dollar hurt EM assets. We believe there is value in EM assets, but the obvious circuit-breakers are still absent: a weaker USD, aggressive China stimulus and fresh Sino-US trade talks. EM assets prospects have soured and protectionism and tighter liquidity continue to cloud their longer-term prospects.

BNP Paribas Asset Management auf dem Fondskongress 2019

Diese Seite teilen